Summary of public responses

A consolidated view of what verified respondents have said about the draft Maharashtra Private Coaching Centers (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2026. Every figure comes straight from the records below and updates as responses arrive.

5
verified respondents
27
votes cast
5
written responses
22
points under discussion

Who is responding

By the role each respondent declared

Coaching centre owner / director
4
Teacher / faculty
1

Where the discussion is concentrated

Written responses per point

Reclassify coaching under a lower GST slab
2
Maximum five hours of coaching per day, not too early or too late
1
One sq. metre per student, no basements, parking, fire and building safety certificates
1
Aptitude testing, realistic expectation-setting, and guidance beyond engineering and medicine
1
Mandatory registration, renewable every 3 years, separately for each branch
0
No enrolment of students below 13 years of age
0
Mandatory public disclosure on the centre's website
0
All-inclusive fee, no mid-course increase, pro-rata refund within 10 days
0

Agreement on each provision

Agreement to the right, disagreement to the left. Ordered from most to least agreed.

Reclassify coaching under a lower GST slab100% agreen=2
Mandatory public disclosure on the centre's website100% agreen=1
Ban on misleading advertisements and guarantees of rank or marks100% agreen=2
Minimum qualification for tutors: graduation100% agreen=1
School and junior college teachers may not be hired by coaching centres100% agreen=1
CCTV, drinking water, first aid, ventilation, separate CWSN-friendly toilets, helpline display100% agreen=1
Grievance redressal mechanism, published; 24-hour action on POCSO and POSH matters100% agreen=1
Non-discrimination and Divyang-friendly premises and teaching100% agreen=1
No enrolment of students below 13 years of age50% agreen=2
Ban on integration with schools and on "dummy school" arrangements50% agreen=2
No batch segregation on academic performance; batches fixed by order of admission50% agreen=2
Mandatory registration, renewable every 3 years, separately for each branch33% agreen=3
Maximum five hours of coaching per day, not too early or too late0% agreen=1
Weekly off for students and tutors; no test the day after; festival leave0% agreen=1
One sq. metre per student, no basements, parking, fire and building safety certificates0% agreen=1
Mandatory counselling system; a centre cannot be registered without one0% agreen=1
Aptitude testing, realistic expectation-setting, and guidance beyond engineering and medicine0% agreen=1
Digital student records to be maintained for ten years0% agreen=1
Powers of entry, inspection, search, seizure and civil-court powers of inquiry officers0% agreen=1
Penalties: ₹1–5 lakh for minor violations, up to ₹10 lakh on repeat, ₹10–50 lakh for major0% agreen=1

The most divided provisions

The points where opinion splits closest to evenly — the provisions that most need further discussion.

  1. 1
    No enrolment of students below 13 years of age
    50% agree · 2 votes · 0 responses
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    Reclassify coaching under a lower GST slab
    100% agree · 2 votes · 2 responses

Point by point

Votes, the mix of positions, and the responses moderators marked as representative.

SupportNeeds changesNeed clarityOppose

📝 Registration & Compliance

💰 Fees & Financial

📚 Academics & Batches

👨‍🏫 Teachers & Staff

🏢 Infrastructure & Safety

🧠 Student Welfare

Points the draft does not cover, raised by respondents

  • Reclassify coaching under a lower GST slab

    Coaching centres are currently taxed as service providers at 18% GST. If the sector is now to be formally registered and regulated as an education provider, the tax treatment should follow: a concessional slab (for example 5%) so the benefit reaches parents and so centres can fund the infrastructure this Bill mandates.